Following cases registered by the Human Rights Commission for (1) not implementing the Supreme court judgement dtd 4 11 22 by EPFO for pension on higher wages/salary under EPS 95 pension scheme (2) option of excercising 11(3) and 11(4) in between employee and employer for pension on higher salary.
Karnataka SHRC has registered a case no. 4208/10/11/2022 on the complaint regarding Vishwanath Wali.-HRCNET,NHRC
Karnataka SHRC has registered a case no. 4209/10/11/2022 on the complaint regarding Vishwanath Wali.-HRCNET,NHRC
-
1. EPFO has implemented EPS 95 pension scheme from 16/11/1995 to their pf members.
-
2. Employee contributing 12% of their basic salary and employer is also contributing equal amount to the EPFO.
-
3. Out of employer contribution 8.33% transferring to EPS 95 pension by EPFO. But EPFO is transferring 8.33% on ceiling salary of RS.5000,6500 pension account and difference to members pf account.
-
4. On ceiling salary pension will be getting on retirement a very minimum amount of RS.500,600…etc.
5. Our demand is pension is paid on actual salary instead of ceiling salary.
-
6. Accordingly Some of pensioners filed suit in High court for pension to be paid on actual salary.
-
.7. High court judgement made in favour of pensioners as pension will be on actual salary.
-
8. EPFO have disagreed the High court judgement and made appeal with Supreme court.
-
9. Supreme court judgement made on 04/11/2022 upheld the High court judgement
-
10. EPFO have still not implemented the decision of Supreme court judgement so far.
-
11. Hence the complaint made with Human Rights dept.
